4 ms·
"Zero expenses". The cars must be maintained, and the drivers must be paid one way or another.
by LordHumungous 10y ago
"Zero expenses". The cars must be maintained, and the drivers must be paid one way or another.
- fullshark 10y agoThe car owner maintains the car, and the customer pays the driver for the ride. Uber is the platform and just takes a little off the top each time. That's the idea at least.
- LordHumungous 10y agoThe owner maintains the car, but Uber has to pay the driver enough to cover the cost. So it's a cost for Uber even though it's not on their balance sheet. "The rider pays the driver" is just semantics since Uber decides the percentage.
- fullshark 10y agoWell the idea (originally) was that the driver is already driving and so they are sharing/renting out their open seat to get a little bit of money. Uber would just skim off the top for matching riders with drivers. The reality of the economics is likely different but that's how it works in theory. Now they are likely paying drivers to be out looking for rides to ensure that service isn't disrupted, and yes they need to subsidize that as others are mentioning.