4 ms·
It's still worth considering that the passenger risks having to share the car, so the lower price is most certainly justified. I doubt Uber is trying to run th
by ryanlol 10y ago
It's still worth considering that the passenger risks having to share the car, so the lower price is most certainly justified.
I doubt Uber is trying to run those cars with only one passenger at a time.
- dilap 10y agoeven with a full car they're still losing a lot of $.
- ryanlol 10y agoI don't know what's the definition of "full" here, but I'd guess they leave the middle back seat empty. 3*18 is still 54 so there's clearly some profit to be made.
- oceanofsolaris 10y agoBut only if they are fully occupied > 90% of all time (which is IMHO not really feasible).
- biggc 10y agoNope, I've had the unpleasant experience of a full pool a few times, they'll fill the back seat if they can.
- dilap 10y agooh, that's a good point -- i was forgetting they can pair up 4 different paying customers. i think it must be rare though -- i see full ubers and full lyfts fairly often, but i've only ever seen 2 couples (& it's only $1 more for a pair).