2 ms·
In my opinion, it is only valuable to present a pristine history to make sure that every "official" commit provides an application that can be ran. This allows
by sethammons 10y ago
In my opinion, it is only valuable to present a pristine history to make sure that every "official" commit provides an application that can be ran. This allows git bisect to do amazing things. In other words, I will git merge --squash. When someone rewrites history after pushing, all they do is make everyone else have a bad day.
- rjbwork 10y agoIf I'm pushing non-building commits on a feature branch in Hg, why should it matter? It documents the history of the development of that feature without interfering with default/master.