3 ms·
I'm reasonably sure this is not true. Anecdotally, for starters, I've never seen a site do this for mobile. Even sites with robust liquid layouts cannot be ex
by BSeward 17y ago
I'm reasonably sure this is not true.
Anecdotally, for starters, I've never seen a site do this for mobile.
Even sites with robust liquid layouts cannot be expected to condense to fit in 480px. At that width even ubiquitous things like a 2-column layout don't work well. Displays that small need a different approach.
- po 17y agoI agree. For the iPhone at least, I think the approach that works best is to be double-tap friendly. I would rather have a site that retains its standard look and feel but easily lets me zoom into the content I'm interested in than a site that tries to squeeze it's multi-column layout onto a small screen.