3 ms·

It maybe wasn't clear, but I was referring to the parent's point about verbosity when using the 'old' Tuple class. using Complex = System.Tuple<double, dou

• douche 10y ago
  Not quite equivalent, since System.Tuple is immutable. So, at minimum: public class Complex { private readonly double _i; private readonly double _j; public double I {get {return _i;}} public double J {get{return _j;}} public Complex(double i, double j){ _i = i; _j = j; } } But System.Tuple is also IComparable, IStructuralComparable, IStructuralEquatable. I haven't had enough coffee yet to add all the boilerplate for that to the above, which only reinforces the point about verbosity.
  • algorithmsRcool 10y ago
    Although with c# 6.0 (current release) you can simplify that to: public class Complex { public double I { get; } public double J { get; } public Complex(double i, double j) { I = i; J = j; } }
    • doodpants 10y ago
      Even before C# 6.0, you could simplify it this way: public class Complex { public double I { get; private set; } public double J { get; private set; } public Complex(double i, double j) { I = i; J = j; } }