Well, an alternative (and more charitable) reading is that these are negative rights. Having the right to internet doesn't mean that someone else has a duty to

Well, an alternative (and more charitable) reading is that these are negative rights. Having the right to internet doesn't mean that someone else has a duty to provide you with a (free) internet connection, it means that forcibly preventing you from procuring an internet connection is not allowed (as opposed to, say, drugs, which you CAN be forcibly prevented from procuring). Compare freedom of expression: Nobody can forcibly prevent you from expressing yourself, but also, nobody has a duty to enable you to express yourself.