Yeah, coming from Java a decade ago this was the first thing I noticed lacking. And with all the stuff C# has introduced beyond that, I'm always fairly surpris

Yeah, coming from Java a decade ago this was the first thing I noticed lacking. And with all the stuff C# has introduced beyond that, I'm always fairly surprised that this hasn't been done. In preparation, the feature currently called "anonymous classes" in C# needs to be redubbed "anonymous records". And in preparation for that, well, "nonymous" records need to be introduced.