3 ms·
Most people don't remember (or weren't around to see) what it was like before Linux. IMHO Linus's biggest contribution to the world was the modern open source
by mikekchar 10y ago
Most people don't remember (or weren't around to see) what it was like before Linux. IMHO Linus's biggest contribution to the world was the modern open source development methodology.
In my 4th year at university I did a project on Mach and was very excited to continue working with it through the HURD. At the time, getting up to date source code for the HURD required sending an email to the team and requesting it. I dutifully did so and was greeted with a reply asking for my CV. I sent it in (as bare as you might imagine it would be as a university student) and was denied access since they only wanted experienced kernel developers to work on the project. I've often regretted not saving that email.
But this is the way it was back then. You waited until something was released to play with it, or you contacted the team to see if they would grant you access to the latest development code.
Linus changed all that by giving ubiquitous access to the code and taking patches from anyone. It was a huge revelation. Keep in mind that this coincided with more open access to the internet, so his attitude was facilitated by the fact that you didn't need to rely on UUCP to slowly distribute code. More and more, people had access to FTP (and soon the web).
The reason for Linux's success, IMHO, is down to that. Everyone flocked to Linux because it was obviously unencumbered by the BSD legal issues and Linus would look at any patch coming his way, regardless of who sent it. This is now de rigour -- to the point where I'm sure the vast majority of people using free software today believe that it's always been that way.
For me, RMS invented the concept of free software. Linus showed how to actually make it work. There were other good projects at the time, but from my perspective nothing came close to Linux.
- notaplumber 10y ago> Linus's biggest contribution to the world was the modern open source development methodology. OpenBSD made a pretty big contribution as well. http://www.openbsd.org/papers/anoncvs-paper.pdf http://www.openbsd.org/papers/anoncvs-paper.pdf http://www.openbsd.org/papers/anoncvs-slides.pdf http://www.openbsd.org/papers/anoncvs-slides.pdf
- mikekchar 10y agoIt's a fair point. I often wonder what would have happened without the potential BSD lawsuits hanging over everything. I remember at the time being torn between installing Linux on my box or BSD. When mmap was finally implemented on Linux, I decided (rather unhappily IIRC) to go with it thinking it was the "safer" choice. One thing to keep in mind, though, wrt OpenBSD is that by the time it arrived on the scene, Linux was well and truly established. The better comparison is NetBSD, which showed up in 1993, but even then Linux was in the fabled 0.99 version (and rapidly running out of letters). It was really Linus's actions before that time that cemented Linux as a legitimate contender -- he had attracted a really large number of very talented programmers. NetBSD, if memory serves, was suffering from a fair amount of internal infighting which eventually ended up with Theo de Raadt being ousted.