3 ms·
Yes if you shell out for all the money to run it on every core, and use a lot memory it is solid. But the bang for your buck, Microsoft SQL has a better support
by valarauca1 10y ago
Yes if you shell out for all the money to run it on every core, and use a lot memory it is solid. But the bang for your buck, Microsoft SQL has a better support plan, and saner licensing model. My experience is working with smaller datasets <200GB so YMMV.
I mean I'd rather use Postgres. But large corps like having a vendor to call.
- nickpsecurity 10y agoCheck out EnterpriseDB. I don't know how good they are in practice. But their speciality is solving the exact problem you mentioned with Oracle vs Postgres. http://www.enterprisedb.com/products-services-training/products/postgres-plus-advanced-server http://www.enterprisedb.com/products-services-training/produ...