2 ms·
That wasn't me. I agree the original comment could have been more substantial. :)
by fzzzy 10y ago
That wasn't me. I agree the original comment could have been more substantial. :)
- SilasX 10y agoI agree (with your point and the "garbage" remark) but FWIW it was obvious to me what the criticism was -- 29% vs [obscured way of saying GT 33.3%].