4 ms·
Charlie Stross wrote recently about the threat of beta radiation to these small probes[1]. This isn't discussed at all in this article or the associated paper[2
by scrumper 10y ago
Charlie Stross wrote recently about the threat of beta radiation to these small probes[1]. This isn't discussed at all in this article or the associated paper[2] which focuses on purely mechanical collision effects. Anyone know if this is a separate consideration for another research group?
[1] http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2016/08/san-trombone-exoplanet-reality.html http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2016/08/san-trom...
[2] http://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.05284v1.pdf http://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.05284v1.pdf
- T-A 10y agoAlpha, not beta (beta radiation is just electrons): > Roughly 1% of the ISM consists of helium atoms, and we have a technical term for an ionized helium nucleus travelling at roughly 2% of the speed of light—6000km/sec—we call it an alpha particle. The article pretty much debunks [1] by concluding that heavier atoms do most damage, but are still manageable.
- scrumper 10y agoThanks for the correction! Bad memory on my part. So the article refutes [1] because the relatively easy to manage mechanical effects of those alpha particles on the spacecraft exterior mean that it actually functions as an effective, long-term shield against alpha particles?