3 ms·
As the author mentioned Python is good for small stuff. If you are building a huge system where the jobs are spread between a dozen of people things could easil
by interdrift 10y ago
As the author mentioned Python is good for small stuff. If you are building a huge system where the jobs are spread between a dozen of people things could easily get out of control and you could end up in the dirt.
- thearn4 10y agoDo you feel this way due to the dynamically typed nature of the language (and the possibility of having ambiguous interfaces)? I've had pretty good luck with rather large scale python projects, though we've been pretty strict about working within a framework.
- interdrift 10y agoYeah mainly due to that. If you don't have a VERY strict approach to writing code, one wrong decision could turn into a few days of debugging..
- jasonpeacock 10y agoWhere 'strict' == 'unit tested', then I agree with you. You don't need strong typing to make good code.
- thearn4 10y agoI would agree that complete and meaningful unit and integration tests are definitely a necessity for a large Python projects. Or really for any software project meant to be maintained.
- jasonpeacock 10y agoYou can write crappy code in any language. I have seen large, easily maintained systems written in Perl, and I have seen horrible little tools written in Java. There's nothing specific to Python.