Statistically rigorous astrology is still bullshit, no matter how much curve-fitting you apply because the core premise is false. Most psychology, as we are now

Statistically rigorous astrology is still bullshit, no matter how much curve-fitting you apply because the core premise is false. Most psychology, as we are now learning when people actually try to replicate experiments, is also bullshit. If economics is starting from equally flawed initial premises regarding individual choice and decision-making, as I and many others believe, then no amount of statistical rigor in the process will change the field from being a contived method of throwing darts and making grand claims about how much you understand dartboards and the aerodynamics of darts.