What's a solution to the voting up of empty articles problem? I'm tired of this whole "everybody's vote counts the same" tactic. If people vote together all t

What's a solution to the voting up of empty articles problem? I'm tired of this whole "everybody's vote counts the same" tactic. If people vote together all the time in close time proximity, let's not count them as high (stomp out voting rings). If somebody upvotes 50 articles a day, maybe they aren't the best judge of quality, so they can get ratcheted back to 1/4 vote weight. Perhaps vote weighting can become stronger at cliffs after every yearly anniversary of the account while the account is engaged on the site (asymptotically approaching a vote weight of 2 after 5 years of contributions). Accounts may not be discriminated against based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, or national origin. Only stupidity, brilliance, and gaming the system can reduce or increase your vote weights.