4 ms·
That's interpolated though - I wonder what it'd look like if you had an actual 200fps source (and the ability to play it)
by voltagex_ 10y ago
That's interpolated though - I wonder what it'd look like if you had an actual 200fps source (and the ability to play it)
- agumonkey 10y agoTrue, I forgot that. I think I've seen one 48fps (maybe first Peter Jackson effort to push this) film and the results wasn't different from interpolated 100Hz TVs, the "movie" looked like a professional documentary. Crisp and dead.
- gambiting 10y agoI saw the first Hobbit in 48fps and that was the first time I ever wanted to walk out of the cinema - was literally unpleasant to watch, my brain was telling me that everything is playing too fast and that audio should be desyncing from video, but it never did. Maybe I would get used to it if all films were made in 48fps, but I certainly can't recommend it after that one experience.
- agumonkey 10y agoSome people say we reject non 24 fps out of ingrained habits, I don't subscribe to this point of view. Nobody ever complained that a movie failed its purpose because it was filmed at 24fps. Tangent: so many movie are lacking in terms of set, direction, pacing, scenario.. why do people believe tech is the variable to improve...