3 ms·
Implementation of this feature wouldn't require much in terms of processing power or storage. It would just be a more interesting and engaging way of getting t
by daveguy 10y ago
Implementation of this feature wouldn't require much in terms of processing power or storage. It would just be a more interesting and engaging way of getting to pokemon beyond the current "click it on an overhead". Game programmers and designers could definitely work with this description to make a feature.
- philtar 10y agoSure. But it's not fun. Which is way more important than any of the things you mentioned. The first thing a game designer thinks of is fun, not system limitations.
- mjevans 10y agoWhat's not fun is the presently 'mapless' version of Pokemon GO we all have access to. Sure I can see if I am near a Pokemon, but I can't actually go after most of them due to GPS jitter and the time it takes to walk/cross at lights in cities. If I absolutely knew which direction to go there is a CHANCE I could get to a Pokemon before it despawns. As things stand now I pretty much have to win a small lottery to capture one where I happen to be taking a scenic walk.
- philtar 10y agoI am not talking about the current version about pokemon go. I am talking about the version suggested by the commenter above.