4 ms·
People seem to confuse rates and percentages with figures. There may be less on average, but more in reality. Not having so many kids on the streets may also ca
by helthanatos 10y ago
People seem to confuse rates and percentages with figures. There may be less on average, but more in reality.
Not having so many kids on the streets may also cause the crimes to be less.
Children wear less clothes than they used to and there seems to be more pedophiles, if those little kids were left alone, more may be taken advantage of.
The risk is real. Children don't know how to react when confronted with maybe a drunk driver or someone that offered them candy, so letting children on their own leaves real risk. However, whether it should be criminalized for a rather small risk is debatable.
- Bjartr 10y ago>There may be less on average, but more in reality. Mind explaining this? I'm having trouble grokking it. >Not having so many kids on the streets may also cause the crimes to be less. The article accounted for this. >Children wear less clothes than they used to and there seems to be more pedophiles, if those little kids were left alone, more may be taken advantage of. What? Do you have any more information on any of these claims? It's coming across as pure conjecture on your part.
- helthanatos 10y ago1. Smaller percentage of a greater amount. 2. Oh well. 3. Children wear much smaller clothes than they used to.