4 ms·
There is no "opponent" here. Is that how you see this, as some sort of confrontation? You're taking this way too personally. There is no opponent, it is just a
by jackhack 10y ago
There is no "opponent" here. Is that how you see this, as some sort of confrontation? You're taking this way too personally. There is no opponent, it is just a discussion.
I read the document. it is not trustworthy because it uses NASA data, proven to be fraudulent. That is my point.
- Rooster61 10y agoIn academic vernacular, it is and has been for centuries common for a person who is criticizing a given work or statement to be referred to as an opponent. It implies not malice, but an indication that that person is presenting a view or idea that differs from the original idea of the work or statement presented in a way that questions its validity or veracity. When one is giving a defense of a thesis or dissertation, the professors who hear the defense are referred to as opponents. To suggest that the very professors who one studies and works with throughout ones degree as actually hostile simply because their job is to find flaws in and oppose the points presented is absurd.
- SamPhillips 10y agoWhy is it then, that there are now cruise ships going through the Northwest passage, roadways built on permafrost melting in Alaska, coral reefs dying worldwide? NASA invented the concept of global warming 40 years ago for political purposes, secretly recruited every other scientific agency-worldwide to collaborate AND coincidentally, unrelated to the billions of tons of greenhouse gasses we release, the world got warmer?