4 ms·
No, it sounds like balanced opinions are always better than radical opinions. Radicals are almost always wrong and always unproductive. And to answer your othe
by blahi 10y ago
No, it sounds like balanced opinions are always better than radical opinions. Radicals are almost always wrong and always unproductive.
And to answer your other question, environmental NGOs have plenty to do with atmospheric research. They publicize it some of it. They fund some of it. They use some of it as a political lever.
- fsloth 10y agoAre there any links between NGO "environmental fud" and IPCC federated results that would point out stronger political rather than scientific drivers for the results?