3 ms·
> And nobody's ever going to trust your ... I guess that could be said for a number of things that people successfully do? Edit: for one great example of some
by eitland 10y ago
> And nobody's ever going to trust your ...
I guess that could be said for a number of things that people successfully do?
Edit: for one great example of someone who didn't get discouraged by naysayers, check caddyserver.
- bryanlarsen 10y agoGreat example. Nobody's going to use caddyserver in production for a major site for a couple years for that reason. Right now it's widely used on 'hobby' sites. A couple of years of good track record on hobby sites will let it be trusted enough to run on more mission critical sites. And caddyserver isn't a distributed service, so the level of trust required is much lower. Distributed services are difficult to get right for a wide variety of reasons, as shown by Aphyr's Jepsen tests.
- eitland 10y agoIt is however already starting to get developer traction and mindshare, even a few donations if I am representative for the userbase, something it would never do now if sat waiting for the perfect timing to release a perfect product. Also I think the README of workq didn't mention anything about raft, which is fine, you can go very far without it. My point is: encourage people to write code! Don't infect people with paralysis-by-analysis.