I'd just like to point out the linguistic paradox of the "one of the worst" syntagm, as only one thing can be the worst, and "one of" implies a multitude of suc

I'd just like to point out the linguistic paradox of the "one of the worst" syntagm, as only one thing can be the worst, and "one of" implies a multitude of such things; if 20 things are the worst, then none of them are. In short, this is a lazy way for the writer to express his opinion but label it as a fact.