> Why are mammograms still being subjectively interpreted? Computer-aided detection and diagnosis software is used in clinical practice, e.g. see [1]. I believ

> Why are mammograms still being subjectively interpreted? Computer-aided detection and diagnosis software is used in clinical practice, e.g. see [1]. I believe that false-postives-per-scan is still somewhat of an issue. [1]: http://www.hologic.com/products/imaging/mammography/image-analytics http://www.hologic.com/products/imaging/mammography/image-an...