3 ms·
It's implicit in any of the arguments supporting key escrow.
by CWuestefeld 10y ago
It's implicit in any of the arguments supporting key escrow.
- tedunangst 10y agoAre they planning to store the escrowed keys on forward deployed staging servers?
- zipwitch 10y agoWhat they're _planning_ is not relevant. What matters is whether they're competent enough to keep such keys secure. (Such as by not allowing malicious actors to get copies of them.) What is relevant is that they are demonstrably _not_ competent.
- tedunangst 10y agoYou don't think the relative attack surface of two classes of machine is relevant? Are "they" (the tailored access division) going to be in charge of safeguarding the keys?
- tptacek 10y agoYou, too, are rebutting an argument nobody is making.