3 ms·
> Rent and invest in something more diversified? Crazy talk. This seems like pie-in-the-sky talk from high-income earners. It's not like people are just freel
by lawpoop 10y ago
> Rent and invest in something more diversified? Crazy talk.
This seems like pie-in-the-sky talk from high-income earners.
It's not like people are just freely choosing to invest in a house over other investments. Instead, since they have to pay for housing no matter what, they are trying to mitigate loss, if not make a return, on the sunk cost of dwelling. If they are renting, they don't have "extra" money that they can arbitrarily put towards whatever they choose.
I don't know the population breakdown in San Francisco, but I would bet that the majority are not developers. Most Americans live paycheck to paycheck and have very little savings. Their house is the single largest store of wealth for people in America.
If they do have savings, it's likely to be in an IRA or a 401k, so they aren't free to apply that to whatever area of investment they like, either.
- superuser2 10y agoPeople who become homeowners aren't buying condos analogous to their current apartments, they're buying (comparatively) enormous houses with front and back yards and 2-car garages. This is not just trying to recover sunk costs, this is a substantial upgrade in consumption. Also, remember that interest is front-loaded in the amortization schedule, and that disappears into the void same as rent. You can pay your mortgage for a long time without building substantial equity.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]