3 ms·
> Unfortunately, the real market does not have a meaningful lower bound on losses. I don't understand what you mean, here. Are you saying that stocks never wen
by x1798DE 10y ago
> Unfortunately, the real market does not have a meaningful lower bound on losses.
I don't understand what you mean, here. Are you saying that stocks never went to zero? Because real stocks also don't go below zero (though you can use leverage to lose more money than you put in, I suppose).
- gnopgnip 10y agoReal stocks get delisted or go bankrupt all the time.
- hueving 10y agoThat's 0
- zekevermillion 10y agoOK, the lower bound on losses you can make on one stock purchased without leverage is == your investment. With repeated activity and/or leverage, there's no hard limit.
- zekevermillion 10y agoThey would go to 0.01, but there was no insolvency in the game (also no leverage, if memory serves).