6 ms·
Seems over-engineered in my opinion. Why not use a simple shell script for mount dependencies and autofs for auto-mounting? Having a service manager job queu
by victorhugo31337 10y ago
Seems over-engineered in my opinion. Why not use a simple shell script for
mount dependencies and autofs for auto-mounting? Having a service manager job queue to mount a file system is a bit much.
- wyldfire 10y agoThat seems to be a popular opinion whenever systemd-subsumes-feature-x comes up. I'm on the fence. I see that systemd is making strides in "fixing" feature gaps that are mostly a consequence of SysV's original goals. I am slowly struggling to replace my understanding of SysV features with systemd's. For user-interactive/desktop style linux computers, systemd can help linux compete well with OS X and other modern OSs. The great news is that there will probably always be a linux distro that will leverage SysV for its simplicity and if we need targets that are simple, it will meet that need.
- brimstedt 10y agoWhat about the overhead of starting bash processes for everything, not to mention parse files, interpret and whatnot? (Presuming systemd is compiled code)