3 ms·

What about simply replacing all "== 0b..." with "!= 0"? That would already be a good improvement, both in terms of DRY and readability, without the need of add

by vog 10y ago

What about simply replacing all "== 0b..." with "!= 0"? That would already be a good improvement, both in terms of DRY and readability, without the need of adding another dependency.

sedatk 10y ago
It wouldn't be the same thing. For instance x & 0b11 != 0 can return true for multiple values of x, 0b10 and 0b01 respectively.
- vog 10y ago
  I see. You are sometimes checking for multiple bits at once. Didn't notice that.