4 ms·

Here's the Chinese if anybody is interested in attempting to read in the original language. https://read.douban.com/reader/ebook/20769128/ https://read.douban.

Here's the Chinese if anybody is interested in attempting to read in the original language. https://read.douban.com/reader/ebook/20769128/ https://read.douban.com/reader/ebook/20769128/

kkylin 10y ago
Thanks! Anyone out there know if there is a way to read this in traditional (as opposed to simplified) Chinese?
- ttflee 10y ago
  Try this link: http://translate.google.com.hk/translate?hl=en&sl=zh-CN&tl=zh-TW&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsmth.net%2Fbbs0an.php%3Fpath%3D%2Fgroups%2Fliteral.faq%2FSF%2Fyuanchuang%2Fwangyou%2Fown%2Ffangfang727 http://translate.google.com.hk/translate?hl=en&sl=zh-CN&tl=z...
  - rabboRubble 10y ago
    Be careful with machine translated Simp to Trad. Traditional to Simplified character mapping is 1 to many. When plugging Simplified into Google Translate, the translation therefore is a many to one and Google frequently doesn't get it right. I'm not sure how Google determines the mapping, perhaps by absolute greatest frequency? Here's an example of what I mean with a commonly used character: (Simplified) 复 maps to (Traditional) 複, 復, and 覆
- rabboRubble 10y ago
  See my caution below about machine language translation Simp to Trad. TL/DR, it doesn't work reliably. My rough estimate is maybe an 20% error rate for characters with a 1 Traditional to many Simplified mapping. Even with Google Translate.