3 ms·
While your assertion about your fork being "the actual development" is unfortunate, I would encourage anybody submitting security issues to the actual perl5 to
by mst 10y ago
While your assertion about your fork being "the actual development" is unfortunate, I would encourage anybody submitting security issues to the actual perl5 to also consider sending them to cperl and MLEHMANN's stableperl, since the users of minority forks deserve security too.
- rurban 10y agoNo worries, found all of them in public tickets already. 2 of them were actually security relevant, one stack overflow, one heap overflow, all 6 issues already fixed in git. Regarding your comment about "deserve security": yes. perl5 would deserve a bit security, but all they do is theatre. dozens of known security fixes are ignored.