The full paper seems to be more of a study of studies, in that it mostly cites other research projects, and groups together studies that hold water. http://m.b

The full paper seems to be more of a study of studies, in that it mostly cites other research projects, and groups together studies that hold water. http://m.brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/08/18/brain.aww209.full http://m.brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/08/18/b... In the "challenges" it warns against reinforcing one's own opinion by cherry-picking data that suites preferences, and also falling into chicken-and-the-egg situations, where cause and effect or symptom and disease might invert. There aren't any actual experiments in this paper. It just says bayesian analysis is a useful tool, and cites instances of success.