3 ms·
I hope this helps with the adoption of newer versions of packages. I have used MacPorts in the past (and Fink before) but I am supper happy with Homebrew these
by stadeschuldt 10y ago
I hope this helps with the adoption of newer versions of packages.
I have used MacPorts in the past (and Fink before) but I am supper happy with Homebrew these days. What I disliked about Macports was:
1. Ports define which compiler to use. Sometimes I had to install a small tool and first it would another version of gcc.
2. Ports were outdated a lot. I developed a project using the Grails-framework and it was a couple of versions behind the current stable release. Just checked: Grails port is at version 2.2 https://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/devel/grails/Portfile https://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/devel/grails/... while the current version being 3.1.10
With Homebrew the adoption rate seems much higher. Also you don't depend on a single maintainer.
- vorg 10y agoProbably doesn't matter because not many Grails 2.x projects are being upgraded to 3.x in the wild anyway.