3 ms·
If the Tor management wants to fire him, that's up to them. For any reason, or no reason at all. It's their decision. On the other hand, "rape" is a delicate ma
by cocotino 10y ago
If the Tor management wants to fire him, that's up to them. For any reason, or no reason at all. It's their decision. On the other hand, "rape" is a delicate matter, and all of this shouldn't have been discussed in public.
>I believe them. You should, too.
I don't believe them for two reasons:
1) There is no actual proof. I don't believe things for which there's no proof.
2) It's possible multiple people didn't like him and therefore between themselves they decided to accuse him of rape to get rid of him.
- sneak 10y agoDirect eyewitness/victim testimony is proof, actually. You can doubt the credibility of that, if you like, but that's up to you; to say there is no proof is a falsehood. It is interesting that you pay more heed to the notion of a character assassination conspiracy involving multiple credible parties than the simpler explanation that perhaps this well-known liar is also a well-known rapist. Have you heard of Occam's Razor?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- cocotino 10y agoNo, those two aren't proof. How the fuck is victim testimony proof? "hello I got raped. plant this man in jail. cya" Same with eyewitnesses. "hello this is my friend. she got raped. plant this man in jail. cya" Medical reports ARE proof. Where are those? PS: I believe it's possible he's a rapist, based on his looks and his degenerate behaviour. But to plant someone in jail, you need actual proof. Period. http://flickrhivemind.net/Tags/appelbaum,jake/Interesting http://flickrhivemind.net/Tags/appelbaum,jake/Interesting
- sneak 10y agoI hate to break it to you, but looks are not correlated in any way with whether or not someone is a rapist. Multiple, independent women accusing someone of rape is, however.