3 ms·

This should be settled in court, not with witch hunting. I personally don't care about the people who work on a project that should be strictly technical. I do

This should be settled in court, not with witch hunting. I personally don't care about the people who work on a project that should be strictly technical. I don't understand why did they have to mix politics in.

sneak 10y ago
That's true insofar as it applies to the question of whether or not he should be imprisoned; unfortunately our society is terrible at such things when it comes to rape. Whether or not Tor wishes to continue employing him should be left to the opinions of Tor management, which they are fully permitted to form after simply listening to the women he raped. I believe them. You should, too. Believing multiple rape victims isn't a witch hunt.
- cocotino 10y ago
  If the Tor management wants to fire him, that's up to them. For any reason, or no reason at all. It's their decision. On the other hand, "rape" is a delicate matter, and all of this shouldn't have been discussed in public. >I believe them. You should, too. I don't believe them for two reasons: 1) There is no actual proof. I don't believe things for which there's no proof. 2) It's possible multiple people didn't like him and therefore between themselves they decided to accuse him of rape to get rid of him.
  - sneak 10y ago
    Direct eyewitness/victim testimony is proof, actually. You can doubt the credibility of that, if you like, but that's up to you; to say there is no proof is a falsehood. It is interesting that you pay more heed to the notion of a character assassination conspiracy involving multiple credible parties than the simpler explanation that perhaps this well-known liar is also a well-known rapist. Have you heard of Occam's Razor?
    - deleted 10y ago
      [deleted]
    - cocotino 10y ago
      No, those two aren't proof. How the fuck is victim testimony proof? "hello I got raped. plant this man in jail. cya" Same with eyewitnesses. "hello this is my friend. she got raped. plant this man in jail. cya" Medical reports ARE proof. Where are those? PS: I believe it's possible he's a rapist, based on his looks and his degenerate behaviour. But to plant someone in jail, you need actual proof. Period. http://flickrhivemind.net/Tags/appelbaum,jake/Interesting http://flickrhivemind.net/Tags/appelbaum,jake/Interesting
      - sneak 10y ago
        I hate to break it to you, but looks are not correlated in any way with whether or not someone is a rapist. Multiple, independent women accusing someone of rape is, however.

sneak 10y ago

That's true insofar as it applies to the question of whether or not he should be imprisoned; unfortunately our society is terrible at such things when it comes to rape. Whether or not Tor wishes to continue employing him should be left to the opinions of Tor management, which they are fully permitted to form after simply listening to the women he raped. I believe them. You should, too. Believing multiple rape victims isn't a witch hunt.

cocotino 10y ago
If the Tor management wants to fire him, that's up to them. For any reason, or no reason at all. It's their decision. On the other hand, "rape" is a delicate matter, and all of this shouldn't have been discussed in public. >I believe them. You should, too. I don't believe them for two reasons: 1) There is no actual proof. I don't believe things for which there's no proof. 2) It's possible multiple people didn't like him and therefore between themselves they decided to accuse him of rape to get rid of him.
- sneak 10y ago
  Direct eyewitness/victim testimony is proof, actually. You can doubt the credibility of that, if you like, but that's up to you; to say there is no proof is a falsehood. It is interesting that you pay more heed to the notion of a character assassination conspiracy involving multiple credible parties than the simpler explanation that perhaps this well-known liar is also a well-known rapist. Have you heard of Occam's Razor?
  - deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
  - cocotino 10y ago
    No, those two aren't proof. How the fuck is victim testimony proof? "hello I got raped. plant this man in jail. cya" Same with eyewitnesses. "hello this is my friend. she got raped. plant this man in jail. cya" Medical reports ARE proof. Where are those? PS: I believe it's possible he's a rapist, based on his looks and his degenerate behaviour. But to plant someone in jail, you need actual proof. Period. http://flickrhivemind.net/Tags/appelbaum,jake/Interesting http://flickrhivemind.net/Tags/appelbaum,jake/Interesting
    - sneak 10y ago
      I hate to break it to you, but looks are not correlated in any way with whether or not someone is a rapist. Multiple, independent women accusing someone of rape is, however.