3 ms·
They are pretty clearly profitable for both of those reasons. They are not at all mutually exclusive.
by darawk 10y ago
They are pretty clearly profitable for both of those reasons. They are not at all mutually exclusive.
- paulcole 10y agoAre they profitable though?
- hueving 10y agoIn the US, yes. They were using that to fund expansion into China/India.
- maverick_iceman 10y agoUber is, I don't know about Lyft. Does anyone here knows about Lyft's profitability?
- tim333 10y agoLyft is losing a fortune. >According to Bloomberg, the ridesharing startup took a net loss of $127 million in the first half of [2015], off less than $47 million in revenue.
- manarth 10y ago$0.19 a ride in the USA (not including “interest, taxes, and equity-based compensation for employees").[1] Although it's possible that after interest, taxes etc, that they're not even profitable in the US yet. [1] https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/uber-says-profitable-us-much-151211910.html https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/uber-says-profitable-us-mu...