3 ms·
It might seem to you that we can answer these questions without revealing secrets, but consider that (1) I've not been answering them and (2) you're asking whet
by justinsb 17y ago
It might seem to you that we can answer these questions without revealing secrets, but consider that (1) I've not been answering them and (2) you're asking whether we can do what was thought to be impossible, so real answers will necessarily provide direction. Short answers will just annoy you, full answers will reveal too much, and frankly, there's little upside in replying. If you'd make a good early-adopter customer for us, contact us and we can have the discussion. But equally, I see that you haven't replied to my call for early-adopters!
One I can definitely answer: yes, full SQL vocabulary support (though we haven't implemented everything yet!)
- moe 17y agoShort answers will just annoy you, full answers will reveal too much Oh well, a simple yes or no would be fine, really. However, I guess it's safe to assume then, that you're not ACID and that data will have to be rearranged to accomodate your system. That's my take-home because a simple "yes" to either question would not have revealed anything.
- justinsb 17y agoWell, if you promise it won't annoy you: Yes, Yes, Correct, Yes (for non-pathological workloads), Choice is good