That's not what I'm saying, although the whole thing would feel less scandalous if Peter Thiel's name wasn't attached. Commenting on the legality of what Gawke

That's not what I'm saying, although the whole thing would feel less scandalous if Peter Thiel's name wasn't attached. Commenting on the legality of what Gawker or Hogan did is above my pay-grade. But a nine-figure judgment that might be overturned but has nevertheless destroyed the company is not a just response to the purported crime. How can it not chill any journalistic organization?