3 ms·
Just because those tools exist doesn't mean people use them. There were decent libraries and high quality code back in 2008 (and 2000) but people didn't necess
by mgkimsal 10y ago
Just because those tools exist doesn't mean people use them.
There were decent libraries and high quality code back in 2008 (and 2000) but people didn't necessarily use them.
It's arguable somewhat easier today, but that's a relative term.
If you're FTPing code from BBedit or Dreamweaver up to your godaddy shared hosting and clicking buttons in cpanel... composer/symfony won't help.
- rimantas 10y ago> Just because those tools exist doesn't > mean people use them. But, oh, they do! At least there in most of the jobs you will deal either with Symfony or with Laravel. > here were decent libraries and high quality code back in > 2008 (and 2000) but people didn't necessarily use them. Please, name a couple from each year. PHP started to mature since PHP 5 and that was released in 2004. While you could have working and tolerable code before that the language was lacking features for high quality code. Maybe if you reframe that as "high quality given the limitations" I'd accept that. But I am seriously curious what would you consider high quality PHP libs from 2000.
- mgkimsal 10y agoMuch of what was in PEAR was decent, if not good, and was used by a lot of folks as the basis for their projects. All judgements of quality are relative to the capabilities of the tech/lang/platform at that time.