5 ms·

Why in the fuck is diversity a "thing"? Algorithimic and behavioral diversity maybe. But this bullshit kumbaya bullshit where team composition has to reflect a

Why in the fuck is diversity a "thing"? Algorithimic and behavioral diversity maybe. But this bullshit kumbaya bullshit where team composition has to reflect a skin color ratio that's suitable for an ad exec's eye is fucking worthless. I've been "lower income". I've been fucking homeless. You're training technical monkey to do technical jobs. No problem with that but don't fucking be "greater diversity blah blah blah".

skybrian 10y ago
It's a thing because many people have complained, they're pretty persuasive, and at least some of us have started listening.
- x0ra 10y ago
  If you really want to get into tech, buy yourself a 4 years old laptop, an internet connection, and start coding. If you are not capable to survive by yourself in tech, you are doomed to fail.
syk26 10y ago
I think there are merits to diversity but of course there are also merits to a fully meritocratic system. But I think the ideal situation would be having a fully meritocratic system that has this "diversity" attribute. I feel as though that is a step up from a fully meritocratic system that has virtually no diversity. Also, perhaps having diversity would allow for the development of new types of products and services in the tech industry that the "privileged" have no interest in. At least that's what people who call for diversity claim.
- flukus 10y ago
  I also agree that there are merits to diversity, it's just that the negatives of forced diversity outweigh the positives.
  - syk26 10y ago
    Yea I can see that. It does make me question every government policy or "handout" that aims to promote diversity, but I'm wondering whether this government policy of providing financial aid to low income students is one that is "forcing" diversity. Could someone clarify for me?
force_reboot 10y ago
Proponents of diversity engage in non-Bayesian updating whereby if a non-diverse company/city/person does well, they update their prior that the system is rigged, but if a diverse company/city/person does well update their prior that diversity has economic benefits.

skybrian 10y ago

It's a thing because many people have complained, they're pretty persuasive, and at least some of us have started listening.

x0ra 10y ago
If you really want to get into tech, buy yourself a 4 years old laptop, an internet connection, and start coding. If you are not capable to survive by yourself in tech, you are doomed to fail.

syk26 10y ago

I think there are merits to diversity but of course there are also merits to a fully meritocratic system. But I think the ideal situation would be having a fully meritocratic system that has this "diversity" attribute. I feel as though that is a step up from a fully meritocratic system that has virtually no diversity. Also, perhaps having diversity would allow for the development of new types of products and services in the tech industry that the "privileged" have no interest in. At least that's what people who call for diversity claim.

flukus 10y ago
I also agree that there are merits to diversity, it's just that the negatives of forced diversity outweigh the positives.
- syk26 10y ago
  Yea I can see that. It does make me question every government policy or "handout" that aims to promote diversity, but I'm wondering whether this government policy of providing financial aid to low income students is one that is "forcing" diversity. Could someone clarify for me?

force_reboot 10y ago

Proponents of diversity engage in non-Bayesian updating whereby if a non-diverse company/city/person does well, they update their prior that the system is rigged, but if a diverse company/city/person does well update their prior that diversity has economic benefits.