3 ms·
That is simply not correct. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeopathy#Efficacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeopathy#Efficacy https://nccih.nih.gov/health/h
by waterphone 10y ago
That is simply not correct.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeopathy#Efficacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeopathy#Efficacy
https://nccih.nih.gov/health/homeopathy#hed4 https://nccih.nih.gov/health/homeopathy#hed4
http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/homeo.html http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/homeo.html
- saskurambo 10y agoMmmm better provide also homeopatic reference
- gnaritas 10y agoNo, homeopatic anecdotes are not science. Science has studied homeopathy and found it to be complete and utter nonsense. That's the end of the story, it's superstition and does not work. You either understand that, or remain willfully ignorant. There are no other options. Homeopathy doesn't work, that's a fact, what part about that known fact seems to confuse you? Why are you insisting something that is KNOWN to not work, works? What don't you get?