3 ms·
>Is your assertion that lawsuits are decided fairly regardless of the amount of money each side is able to invest? Obviously not, or Bollea wouldn't have sough
by GrumpyYoungMan 10y ago
>Is your assertion that lawsuits are decided fairly regardless of the amount of money each side is able to invest?
Obviously not, or Bollea wouldn't have sought Thiel's funding. Are you sure you that's the argument you intended to make? :)
>You should read about the history of champerty and maintenance in common law.
As a matter of fact, I have. I'd be very concerned about both champerty and maintenance ... if I were a wealthy British nobleman living several centuries ago. Those laws were deemed unnecessary in the modern era and repealed. It's just plain silly to bring up stale history.
- zorpner 10y agoYes, obviously, since the injection of wealth into a lawsuit produces unfairness. You're playing dumb, and it just makes you look dumb. Those who forget the lessons of history, etc...
- jimmydddd 10y agoI would think that typically, a corporation has a large financial advantage over the individual in a potential lawsuit. For example, if they published a video of mine, I wouldn't even be able to pay enough to hire attorneys to file a lawsuit. It could be argued that Thiel was just leveling the playing field.