3 ms·
Full PDF: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/353/6301/819.full.pdf http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/353/6301/819.full.... This paper is cool be
by tomkinstinch 10y ago
Full PDF:
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/353/6301/819.full.pdf http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/353/6301/819.full....
This paper is cool because they've optimized the E. coli genome to entirely eliminate certain codons, which would, for example, prohibit infection by viruses that depend on particular codons. It also frees up codons for other usage, including novel tRNA complexes. The paper mentions the authors have validated 55 recoded segments of 50kb each. At ~$0.10/bp that would cost $577,500 for the DNA alone, though the authors likely paid less or synthesized the fragments in-house.
This is somewhat related to codon optimization, which is typically employed when genes are added to an organism to enhance expression, since codon usage bias[1] varies by host organism. If you modify an inserted gene so its codons match the dominant synonymous tRNA present, you'll see higher expression of the gene product. If you're engineering E. coli to produce insulin, your bioreactor will produce more of it for a given amount of feedstock.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codon_usage_bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codon_usage_bias
- phkahler 10y agoI've always thought the redundant encoding allowed for variations in stability. Some encodings of a protein can be subjected to more mutations than others without affecting the resulting protein. The different variations may (I haven't looked) allow a higher number of "neighbor" proteins that can be reached through a single mutation if we consider a codon variation not to be a mutation if the resulting protein is identical. These are things that may have effects on evolution, but not the individual.