3 ms·
This stress test is assuming credit losses about a quarter of the size of the stress test 2 years ago, and much smaller than the last crisis (0.56% vs. 2% vs. 1
by evanpw 10y ago
This stress test is assuming credit losses about a quarter of the size of the stress test 2 years ago, and much smaller than the last crisis (0.56% vs. 2% vs. 1.4%). Does anybody know if something has structurally improved in the Fannie/Freddie portfolios, or whether the testers are just less pessimistic than they were 2 years ago?
[1] http://www.fhfa.gov/AboutUs/Reports/ReportDocuments/2016_DFAST_Severely-Adverse-Scenario.pdf http://www.fhfa.gov/AboutUs/Reports/ReportDocuments/2016_DFA...
[2] http://www.fhfa.gov/AboutUs/Reports/ReportDocuments/GSEFinProj2014FINAL.pdf http://www.fhfa.gov/AboutUs/Reports/ReportDocuments/GSEFinPr...
[3] https://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/irasohnfinal2014.pdf https://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/irasohnfin...
- fathom 10y agoIf anything this [1] article would lead the reader to believe since Fannie/Freddie are now spearheading the leading charge their portfolios are further out of line with the market reality. [1] http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21705317-americas-housing-system-was-centre-last-crisis-it-has-still-not-been-properly http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21705317-americas-hous...