4 ms·
How? Through claiming to be against objectification and then refusing to remove Hulk Hogan's sex tape?
by tobyg123 10y ago
How? Through claiming to be against objectification and then refusing to remove Hulk Hogan's sex tape?
- fullshark 10y agoBy a lawsuit bankrolled by a billionaire (not the damaged party) out for blood
- bitchypat 10y agoThis is nothing new. It's probably been going on since the advent of the judicial system. Would this be A-OK if the lawyers had taken the case pro bono? Or would we be crying about how good lawyers should have to charge people equally? Seems to me that the billion dollar media conglomerates could have funded Gawker's lawyers to protect their ability to release people's sex tapes.