4 ms·
That's the very thing I am talking about. Britain was the first country in which it was a massive political liability to support slavery, and the first country
by JetSetWilly 10y ago
That's the very thing I am talking about. Britain was the first country in which it was a massive political liability to support slavery, and the first country in which the opinions of ordinary people mobilising and campaigning against slavery actually mattered and made a difference.
You can cast this in cynical terms as self interest, but you can do that with any action by any state in history - Britain is hardly unique there.
- pjriot 10y agoI don't think its being particularly cynical to say if the industries supported by slavery had not been supplanted somewhat (reducing their political power) then slavery would have continued apace. Politicians have proven adept at taking advantage of popular movements when suitable. Its basic economics. Had the ruling elite deemed it necessary I'm sure Punch could have been commissioned to print all manner of xenophobic cartoons about subhuman slaves and their barbarism in order to justify the practice further. This isn't to diminish the efforts of the anti-slavery movement or the individuals involved. *Edit: Also, yes, this is not unique to any country at all. I'm sure there are a myriad of examples of slavery within any of the countries that Britain colonised throughout history.
- keyboardwarrior 10y agovery dark yet very accurate