4 ms·
Respectfully disagree. I've been writing full-on applications using Python and Qt4 which are well over 100 lines of code.
by scarygliders 10y ago
Respectfully disagree. I've been writing full-on applications using Python and Qt4 which are well over 100 lines of code.
- satysin 10y agoThat's cool, we are just different is all. I use Python for automation tasks that require more than what I can do with Bash/Batch/PowerShell but don't warrant a full write/compile/deploy process. If your job is working in Python then sure you are going to use it way past the limits of what I would use it for. Things are a lot nicer these days than 10 years ago though with PyCharm, etc. it makes managing a Python project so much easier.
- dagw 10y agoMe too. And personally I'm somewhat conflicted as to whether or not it's a good idea. On the one hand I love python and use it for virtually all code I write (that doesn't have to run in a browser) and I'm quite convinced that for what I'm doing it's the most efficient language for me to use. On the other hand I have found myself on more than one occasion really wishing python wasn't quite so dynamic when working on large python code bases and if I was starting a new large desktop application today I'm not sure python would be my first choice. There really is something to be said for a better/stricter type system.