6 ms·
Frankly ever since the issue first showed up on a news site, i have held that legacy gTLDs should be moved under .us, and that new gTLDs should not be issued.
by digi_owl 10y ago
Frankly ever since the issue first showed up on a news site, i have held that legacy gTLDs should be moved under .us, and that new gTLDs should not be issued.
Then it would be up to each nation to enact rules for their part of the net, and nothing more.
Right now, if i happen to access a .com that is operated by a non-US entity, am i subject to the rules of USA, the nation of origin of said entity, or where they happen to have their servers housed?
- dublinben 10y agoYou might not be subject to US jurisdiction, but the US asserts that entities using a TLD administered in the US, are subject to US jurisdiction.