4 ms·
I'll never forget a discussion with a very intelligent professional American (in the software business) who refused to believe that America could possibly be en
by afandian 10y ago
I'll never forget a discussion with a very intelligent professional American (in the software business) who refused to believe that America could possibly be engaged in torture. She just refused to believe that a country as 'great' as the US could commit torture. (this was a few years ago under GWB when Guantanamo was all over the UK papers but presumably still being suppressed in the US media).
The more stories like this are told and remove any shadow of a doubt about the foundations that western imperial states are built on the better.
Occasionally British politicians talk about "British Values" or "Making Great Britain Great Again" without any hit of acknowledgement of what 'British values' really entailed in reality.
- RodericDay 10y agoI watched Zootopia with my gf, and I was surprised to see torture so normalized that the two "good guy" protagonists do a deal with the mob to torture some creature to advance the plot, and it's played up for laughs.
- Cacti 10y agoLet's be clear here though: it's not western imperial states, it's all imperial states throughout all of history, and all countries behave very differently at home compared to abroad.
- afandian 10y agoI'm not sure what your point is. Yes lots of nations commit atrocities and have done through time. If anything that's less of a reason to disbelieve that your taxes, and those of your predecessors, are being spent on atrocities.
- golergka 10y agoI think that the parent comment author meant the usual anti-colonialism which attacks western colonialism as something unique and blames virtually any hardships of former colonies on it. I recently saw an article which argued that honor killings in Pakistan are to be blamed on colonialism — because, apparently, palistani men felt oppressed by colonial past and had to take it out on their wives, daughters and sisters. Unfortunately, this absurd position gets a lot of support nowadays, and often when you try to argue against it you're insantly labeled all kinds of things.
- throwaway-hn123 10y agoI guess people get upset about this sort of thing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_major_famines_in_India_during_British_rule https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_major_famines_in_I... Or this http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/7991820/Winston-Churchill-blamed-for-1m-deaths-in-India-famine.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/7991820... But sure, focus on some absurd strawman, and ignore the millions of deaths that the British were responsible for.
- lobotryas 10y agoNo one in this thread is claiming the Brits were innocent lambs. Parent is pointing out that violence is endemic to empire, regardless whether that empire was built by the west, asia, or africa. Engaging in "what-about-ism" will not get a conversation far.
- throwaway-hn123 10y agoThere is a very common narrative that tries to say that the British Empire was good for India, and wasn't like all the other savage empires.
- golergka 10y agoOnce again, you're taking my comment, throw out all attempt to be detailed and nuanced and assume that I have a radical point of view just because it's easier for you to digest and argue against. Can we please stop this pattern in internet discussions? You're arguing against a strawman that is completely absent here.
- throwaway-hn123 10y agoYou've taken one absurd article (not even cited), and used it to fuel some specious argument that just people regard western colonialism as unique. I'm just pointing out that British colonialism (directly relevant, because of Pakistan) was a bad thing, regardless of whether other empires also acted savagely, and regardless of whether a handful of people use it as an excuse for current abhorrent behaviours. Not sure what's so hard to understand.
- cafard 10y agoThere was plenty of stuff about Guantanamo in the newspapers, for what that is worth.
- dpark 10y agoThere was no suppression of the Guantanamo abuses in the US media. It was widely reported. I also wonder if you misremember. It's plausible that the person you described refused to believe that the abuses were systemic. It is implausible that a "very intelligent professional" would legitimately deny the abuses entirely. They were widely reported and well documented. Edit: Actually, you could have just been dealing with someone who actively chooses ignore this stuff. That is a sad possibility. It was still widely reported, though.
- afandian 10y agoI was shocked because she fell into the demographic that I would expect to know. Anyway, one thing that isn't in doubt is that it was only one data point. It's good to have some balancing opinions!