5 ms·
The difference is that the ambient advertisement doesn't meaningfully change the appearance of your piece of property. And in any case, you have no legal right
by GavinMcG 10y ago
The difference is that the ambient advertisement doesn't meaningfully change the appearance of your piece of property. And in any case, you have no legal right to shut out the world.
- alanwatts 10y ago>The difference is that the ambient advertisement doesn't meaningfully change the appearance of your piece of property. Property: a thing or things belonging to someone. Do our minds not belong to us?
- ryandrake 10y agoI just wanted to say this exchange about whether advertising can be likened to trespass and vandalism has been very thought provoking. Your argument holds water. Have an up-vote.
- GavinMcG 10y agoIf you're redefining property that way, sure. But of course that's wrong in the legal sense. You've never had a legal right to control what enters your eyes and ears.