Sorry, but as far as I can tell you are not fully correct. A clearly stated "No" did already suffice before these "reforms". Also, I read a lot of articles by

Sorry, but as far as I can tell you are not fully correct. A clearly stated "No" did already suffice before these "reforms". Also, I read a lot of articles by people way more versed in these topics then me who did really not agree with the way the new version of the law turned out. Even former judges who are afraid of the things to come under these new laws. Maybe I am wrong, but I do strongly believe in innocent until proven otherwise. At least for me this law feels more like another step in the direction of guilty until proven innocent. [Edit formatting]