231 ms·
But it's "psychopaths" all the way down. I like very much that you chose "to save itself". My resume is full of firms that did exactly that. The ones that are s
by ArkyBeagle 10y ago
But it's "psychopaths" all the way down. I like very much that you chose "to save itself". My resume is full of firms that did exactly that. The ones that are still open are muddling along, about where they were before I worked for 'em. They are firms that are "retired".
There is little that is "psychopathic" about it; it's just mildly complex mathematics, the sort used in accounting.
It's just a reflection of "space does not care".
I think it's much, much simpler. The defacto standard for a firm is everyone underfoot, whirring away. Those who deviate from this are blamed when tightening occurs. This is reported as "remote work is on the wane." That becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. Likewise, one failure in coordination and remote work is blamed.
Wanna know what's worse? Shorting the ability of many, many people to remotely work is probably the right bet.